LAST week two airline companies in different parts of the world rewarded their owners with profits — which is the reason any company is in business. Air France-KLM, the Dutch-French joint venture partly owned by the French state, has this year posted a €118m (about R2bn) net profit, after four years of losses, including €225m in 2014.
Closer to home, Comair reported an R83.7m net profit for the six months ended December. Admittedly, that is half the R163.6m net profit of December 2014. It is a profit nonetheless, and from this the company pays dividends annually.
Comair has been recording full-year profits since its establishment in 1946. It was listed on the JSE in July 1998.
Ethiopian Airlines, wholly owned by the Ethiopian government, says it has been making net profits for the five years to 2014 — the latest available figures on its website. The company claims its unspecified 2014 profit was bigger than that of all African airlines combined that year. That is highly unlikely, but possible.
Kenya Airways, listed on the Nairobi stock exchange and partly owned by Air France-KLM and the Kenyan government, has been making losses for the past three years.
On releasing its interim numbers last November, the company announced a turnaround plan that it says will shave off US$146m in costs over the next two years and return it to profitability.
Which takes us to our own flag carrier, SA Airways. Finance minister Pravin Gordhan is scratching his head trying to find another R5bn “guarantee” so the airline can publish financial results for the year ended March 2015. That is correct — almost 12 months after its year-end the company is still unable to publish its financial performance. That’s because it cannot to do so without admitting that it has been insolvent for a while, and thus would have to file for bankruptcy.
For the year ended March 2014 SAA reported a loss of another R1bn. Try to add that to the operating losses the company has been racking up since the early 1990s and let me know when you have the sum. Please also remind me how many chief executives and board directors SAA has had only in the past five years, if that’s not too much to ask.
If Gordhan, who this week tried to tell the markets and the world that government is prudently managing its finances, grants SAA another bailout, it will add to the more than R30bn of our bailout money the airline has gobbled up since 1999.
On each occasion SAA has promised that “this turnaround plan” will put it on a sustainable path — only to come back with an even fancier promise the following year, backed by yet another clueless public enterprises minister.
So how are these other airlines, which are all much better managed, able to perform while SAA cannot? The main differentiator is that they — other than the Ethiopian state-owned company — have shareholders who demand returns for their money.
From the French, Ethiopian and Kenyan governments to the investors on the JSE, Nairobi, Euronext Paris and Amsterdam, the shareholders demand performance and tolerate no corruption in their companies.
SAA, on the other hand, seems to be used by the SA government as both an employment agency for its more than 11 500 employees and a cash dispenser for the cronies of the politicians in charge.
The company operates a fleet of 53 aircraft. That is slightly more than the 43 planes operated by Kenya Airways and fewer than Ethiopian Airlines’ 76 aircraft. Being a state-owned company, the Horn of Africa carrier also has an inflated staff component, with 12 000 employees (for 23 more aircraft), only 500 more than SAA’s. Kenya Airways, on the other hand, employs the same 4 000 people to operate its fleet of 43 planes as it did to handle 28 aircraft six years ago.
Article from: http://www.financialmail.co.za/opinion/Betweenthechains/2016/02/25/between-the-chains-saa-needs-more-bailout-money (Accessed on 2 March 2016 5.18pm)